p. 135−160
2357-0369
Vol.53/No.2
p. 161−173
2357-0369
Vol.53/No.2
p. 175−194
2357-0369
Vol.53/No.2
p. 195−206
2357-0369
Vol.53/No.2
p. 207−220
2357-0369
Vol.53/No.2
p. 221−235
2357-0369
Vol.53/No.2
p. 237−248
2357-0369
Vol.53/No.2
p. 249−266
2357-0369
Vol.53/No.2
p. 267−280
2357-0369
Vol.53/No.2
elemental sulphur > gypsum, 8.0 Mg fed-1 > gypsum 4.0 Mg fed-1 > control. - Proline content gave the highest value (18.4 μmol g-1) under the treatment of gypsum at the rate of 4.0 Mg fed-1 in a descending order; gypsum, 4.0 Mg fed-1 > gypsum, 8.0 Mg fed-1 > elemental sulphur > sulphuric acid > control. - Soil available N, P and K were increased due to the application of different treatments over the control. The corresponding highest N and K values were 55.1 and 202 mg kg-1 soil, respectively and recorded under application of sulphuric acid while it was 4.75 mg P kg-1 soil due to the treatment of 8 Mg gypsum fed-1. The highest values of Fe, Mn and Zn (2.92, 2.41 and 0.85 mg kg-1 soil, respectively) were obtained due to sulphuric acid treatment. Soil pH and soil EC were decreased due to the application of the treatments comparing to the control. The lowest soil pH and EC values (7.98 and 7.53 dS m-1, respectively) were obtained under sulphuric acid treatment.]]>
p. 281−298
2357-0369
Vol.53/No.2